在实施奇怪的重复模板模式(CRTP)时,析构函数是否需要是虚拟的?如果没有,那么适当的非虚拟实现是什么?
我将提供一个有希望让事情变得更容易的例子:
template<typename T>
class Base
{
public:
virtual ~Base()
{
// Should this be virtual? Non-virtual?
std::cout << "Base::~Base()\n";
}
};
class Derived : public Base<Derived>
{
public:
~Derived() override
{
std::cout << "Derived::~Derived()\n";
}
};
int main()
{
Base<Derived>* b = new Derived;
delete b;
}
结果:
Derived::~Derived()
Base::~Base()
编辑:更新了示例以使用运行时多态性,以便正确清理虚拟析构函数。
答案 0 :(得分:3)
在这个意义上,CRTP基类与任何其他基类没有什么不同。只有当您通过指向delete
的指针Derived
Base<Derived>
类型的对象时,才需要虚拟析构函数。否则,不需要虚拟析构函数。
Base<Derived>* b = new Derived;
delete b; // Base<Derived>::~Base<Derived> must be virtual
答案 1 :(得分:1)
在您展示的示例中,不需要虚拟析构函数。当您需要使用指向基类的指针调用它时,只需要一个虚拟析构函数,就像在这种情况下重写函数必须是虚函数一样。对于您所展示的CRTP类,很少需要删除Base<T>
而不是T
本身。
int main()
{
Derived *a = new Derived();
// we have the right type anyway, so dont actually need a virtual anything (even normal virtual methods)
delete a;
Derived *a = new Dervied();
Base<Derived> *b = a;
// We are now deleting via a parent class, so this needs a virtual destructor.
// This is pretty uncommon with a simple CRTP however.
delete b;
}
答案 2 :(得分:0)
如果你打算在一个指向派生对象的基类的指针上调用delete
,那么你需要一个虚拟析构函数,这就是它的全部内容。 CRTP或没有CRTP。