我因为以下问题而奋斗了一周:
如何通过存储库删除子实体而不修改关系拥有(父)一侧的List?
提前致谢。
我希望得到一些答案!
孩子类:
@Entity
@Table(name = "child")
@Cache(usage = CacheConcurrencyStrategy.NONSTRICT_READ_WRITE)
public class Child implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Id
@GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.SEQUENCE, generator = "sequenceGenerator")
@SequenceGenerator(name = "sequenceGenerator")
private Long id;
@ManyToOne
private Parent parent;
public Long getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(Long id) {
this.id = id;
}
public Long getParent() {
return parent;
}
public void setParent(Parent parent) {
this.parent = parent;
}
}
父级类:
@Entity
@Table(name = "parent")
@Cache(usage = CacheConcurrencyStrategy.NONSTRICT_READ_WRITE)
public class Parent implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Id
@GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.SEQUENCE, generator = "sequenceGenerator")
@SequenceGenerator(name = "sequenceGenerator")
private Long id;
@OneToMany(mappedBy = "parent", cascade = CascadeType.ALL, orphanRemoval = true)
@JsonIgnore
@Cache(usage = CacheConcurrencyStrategy.NONSTRICT_READ_WRITE)
private Set<Child> children = new HashSet<>();
public Long getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(Long id) {
this.id = id;
}
public Set<Child> getChildren() {
return children;
}
public void setChildren(Set<Child> children) {
this.children = children;
}
public Parent addChild(Child child) {
this.children.add(child);
child.setParent(this);
return this;
}
public Parent removeChild(Child child) {
this.children.remove(child);
child.setParent(null);
return this;
}
}
此处测试:
@Test
@Transactional
public void testParentToChildRelationShip() {
Parent parent = new Parent();
Child child = new Child();
parent.addChild(child);
parent.addChild(new Child());
parent.addChild(new Child());
parent.addChild(new Child());
parentRepository.save(parent);
Assertions.assertThat(parentRepository.count()).isEqualTo(1L);
Assertions.assertThat(childRepository.count()).isEqualTo(4L);
childRepository.delete(child);
Assertions.assertThat(parentRepository.count()).isEqualTo(1L);
// fails
Assertions.assertThat(childRepository.count()).isEqualTo(3L);
parentRepository.delete(parent.getId());
Assertions.assertThat(parentRepository.count()).isEqualTo(0L);
Assertions.assertThat(childRepository.count()).isEqualTo(0L);
}
如果我在删除孩子之前插入,测试将起作用,
child.getParent().removeChild(child);
但我想避免这样称呼。 有没有办法让它只调用Child-JPA-Repository.delete方法?或者我错过的其他注释?
答案 0 :(得分:1)
由于child
与parent
有关联,因此您需要使用
parent.removeChild(child);
或
child.getParent().removeChild(child);
答案 1 :(得分:0)
从父类以及children
@OneToMany(mappedBy = "parent", cascade = CascadeType.ALL, orphanRemoval = true)
@JsonIgnore
@Cache(usage = CacheConcurrencyStrategy.NONSTRICT_READ_WRITE)
private Set<Child> children = new HashSet<>();
我认为您可以从child mapping
中移除parent class
,以便您可以使用ChildRepository
delete()
方法轻松删除子行,但问题是您必须保存您的孩子manually
使用ChildRepository
save()
。您无法使用ParentRepository
使用父对象保存子对象。更改测试代码,如下所示,以保存child
和parent
Parent parent = new Parent();
Parent parent = parentRepository.save(parent);
Child child = new Child();
child.setParent(parent);
childRepository.save(child);