当我尝试将我的代码从trunk合并到分支时,我发现了这些冲突。 在此文件中出现了多个冲突,我需要分别解决每个冲突。我是使用SVN的新手,我使用终端来提交我的代码。 这是冲突:
Select: (p) postpone, (df) diff-full, (e) edit, (r) resolved,
(mc) mine-conflict, (tc) theirs-conflict,
(s) show all options: dc
@@
}
} // end of whilefor loop for condition
<<<<<<< MINE (select with 'mc') (1571,3)
if(!ifScriptForPrimitiveFactFields.isEmpty()) {
ifScriptForPrimitiveFactFields += " && (" + ifVerScriptForPrimitiveFactFields + " || hasChanged )";
||||||| ORIGINAL (1575,6)
if (ifScriptForPrimitiveFactFields != null && !ifScriptForPrimitiveFactFields.isEmpty()) {
if (rule != null && rule.isTriggerApprovalsOnValuesChange() && ifVerScriptForPrimitiveFactFields != null
&& !ifVerScriptForPrimitiveFactFields.isEmpty()) {
ifScriptForPrimitiveFactFields += " && (" + ifVerScriptForPrimitiveFactFields + " || hasChanged )";
}
=======
if (ifScriptForPrimitiveFactFields != null && !ifScriptForPrimitiveFactFields.isEmpty()) {
if (rule != null && rule.isTriggerApprovalsOnValuesChange() && ifVerScriptForPrimitiveFactFields != null
&& !ifVerScriptForPrimitiveFactFields.isEmpty()) {
ifScriptForPrimitiveFactFields += " && (" + ifVerScriptForPrimitiveFactFields + " || hasChanged )";
}
>>>>>>> THEIRS (select with 'tc') (1575,6)
} else {
if(rule != null && rule.isTriggerApprovalsOnValuesChange()) {
ifScriptForPrimitiveFactFields = "(!idToObjMap || hasChanged)";
@@
if(verDataMap != null) {
idField = verDataMap.get("ID_FIELD");
}
<<<<<<< MINE (select with 'mc') (2313,3)
versionCondition = "(!idToObjMap "
+ "|| (!idToObjMap?.get(i." + idField + ")) || (idToObjMap?.get(i." + idField
+ ") && i." + factFieldScriptMappingString + subFieldStr + "!=idToObjMap?.get(i."+ idField + ")?." + factFieldScriptMappingString + subFieldStr + ")) ";
||||||| ORIGINAL (2334,3)
versionCondition = "(" + Constants.IS_FIRST_SALES_APPROVAL + " || (idToObjMap?.get(i." + idField
+ ") && i." + factFieldScriptMappingString + subFieldStr + "!=idToObjMap?.get(i." + idField + ")?."
+ factFieldScriptMappingString + subFieldStr + ")) ";
=======
versionCondition = "(" + Constants.IS_FIRST_SALES_APPROVAL + " || (idToObjMap?.get(i." + idField + ") && i."
+ factFieldScriptMappingString + subFieldStr + "!=idToObjMap?.get(i." + idField + ")?."
+ factFieldScriptMappingString + subFieldStr + ")) ";
>>>>>>> THEIRS (select with 'tc') (2334,3)
return versionCondition;
}
@@
Date addedDate = businessCalendar.add(submitDate, duration);
long durationSecs = addedDate.getTime() - submitDate.getTime();
<<<<<<< MINE (select with 'mc') (2330,3)
expression = "(" + factFieldScriptMapping + ">=" + "order_submit_date) && (" + factFieldScriptMapping + "<="
+ "order_submit_date" + "+" + durationSecs + ")";
return expression;
||||||| ORIGINAL (2351,3)
expression = "(" + factFieldScriptMapping + "<=" + "order_submit_date ) && (" + durationSecs + "+"
+ factFieldScriptMapping + ">= " + "order_submit_date )";
return expression;
=======
if (hours == 0) {
return "(new Date(" + factFieldScriptMapping + ").getDay()" + "=="
+ "new Date(order_submit_date).getDay()) && ((" + factFieldScriptMapping + "-" + "order_submit_date"
+ ").abs()" + "<" + "86400000)";
} else {
expression = "(" + factFieldScriptMapping + ">" + "order_submit_date) && (" + factFieldScriptMapping + "<"
+ "order_submit_date" + "+" + durationSecs + ")";
return expression;
}
>>>>>>> THEIRS (select with 'tc') (2351,9)
}
private String isWithinXWorkingDaysofSubmitForApprovals(List<String> values, String factFieldScriptMapping) {
@@
+ "order_submit_date" + "+" + durationSecs + ")";
return expression;
}
<<<<<<< MINE (select with 'mc') (2352,5)
Date addedDate = businessCalendar.add(submitDate, duration);
long durationSecs = addedDate.getTime() - submitDate.getTime();
expression = "(" + factFieldScriptMapping + ">=" + "order_submit_date) && (" + factFieldScriptMapping + "<="
+ "order_submit_date" + "+" + durationSecs + ")";
return expression;
||||||| ORIGINAL (2373,5)
Date addedDate = businessCalendar.add(submitDate, duration);
long durationSecs = addedDate.getTime() - submitDate.getTime();
expression = "(" + factFieldScriptMapping + "<=" + "order_submit_date ) && (" + durationSecs + "+"
+ factFieldScriptMapping + ">= " + "order_submit_date )";
return expression;
=======
>>>>>>> THEIRS (select with 'tc') (2382,0)
}
private String isWithinXhoursofSubmitForApprovals(List<String> values, String factFieldScriptMapping) {
<<<<<<< MINE (select with 'mc') (2360,2)
return "(" + factFieldScriptMapping + ">=" + "order_submit_date) && (" + factFieldScriptMapping + "<="
+ "order_submit_date" + "+" + Long.parseLong(values.get(0)) * 3600000 + ")";
||||||| ORIGINAL (2381,2)
return "(" + factFieldScriptMapping + "<=" + "order_submit_date ) && (" + Long.parseLong(values.get(0)) * 3600000
+ "+" + factFieldScriptMapping + ">=" + "order_submit_date )";
=======
if (Long.parseLong(values.get(0)) == 0) {
return "(new Date(" + factFieldScriptMapping + ").getDay()" + "=="
+ "new Date(order_submit_date).getDay()) && ((" + factFieldScriptMapping + "-" + "order_submit_date"
+ ").abs()" + "<" + "86400000)";
} else {
return "(" + factFieldScriptMapping + ">" + "order_submit_date) && (" + factFieldScriptMapping + "<"
+ "order_submit_date" + "+" + Long.parseLong(values.get(0)) * 3600000 + ")";
}
>>>>>>> THEIRS (select with 'tc') (2385,8)
}
private String isWithinXdayofSubmitForApprovals(List<String> values, String factFieldScriptMapping) {
<<<<<<< MINE (select with 'mc') (2365,2)
return "(" + factFieldScriptMapping + ">=" + "order_submit_date) && (" + factFieldScriptMapping + "<="
+ "order_submit_date" + "+" + Long.parseLong(values.get(0)) * 86400000 + ")";
||||||| ORIGINAL (2386,2)
return "(" + factFieldScriptMapping + "<=" + "order_submit_date ) && (" + Long.parseLong(values.get(0)) * 86400000
+ "+" + factFieldScriptMapping + ">=" + "order_submit_date)";
=======
if (Long.parseLong(values.get(0)) == 0) {
return "(new Date(" + factFieldScriptMapping + ").getDay()" + "=="
+ "new Date(order_submit_date).getDay()) && ((" + factFieldScriptMapping + "-" + "order_submit_date"
+ ").abs()" + "<" + "86400000)";
} else {
return "(" + factFieldScriptMapping + ">" + "order_submit_date) && (" + factFieldScriptMapping + "<"
+ "order_submit_date" + "+" + Long.parseLong(values.get(0)) * 86400000 + ")";
}
>>>>>>> THEIRS (select with 'tc') (2396,8)
}
@Override
Select: (p) postpone, (df) diff-full, (e) edit, (r) resolved,
(mc) mine-conflict, (tc) theirs-conflict,
(s) show all options:
在这里,我有第一次冲突(1571,3)我需要做一个 mc(我的冲突)来保留原始代码并删除我的更改,其余的我已经使用< strong> tc(他们的冲突)保留我的更改并删除原始代码。 但我只能在终端输入一个选项。
请您帮我弄清楚如何对不同冲突的同一文件进行多次更改。
答案 0 :(得分:3)
您基本上有两种选择:
使用&#39; e&#39; (编辑): 在这种情况下,编辑器将打开相关文件并包含您在dc
输出中看到的所有冲突标记。然后,您可以搜索<<<<<<<
以查找所有冲突的区域,手动解决它们,并在保存并关闭编辑器后,单击r
以标记此文件的冲突已解决。
使用&#39; p&#39; (推迟): 在这种情况下,svn将不执行任何操作并继续下一个文件。合并过程完成并运行svn st
后,您会看到标有p
的文件标有C
(出于冲突)。然后,您可以继续手动解决所有冲突,如上所述。完成后,您需要执行svn resolve --accept=working filename
告诉svn您已完成冲突解决。