我有这个班级
class Invoice < ActiveRecord::Base
scope :last_with_number, -> (firm) {firm.invoices.where('number IS NOT NULL').order("number ASC").last}
end
当我在控制台中运行Invoice.last_with_number(Firm.first).number
时,出现此错误
2.0.0p247 :001 > Invoice.last_with_number(Firm.first).number
Firm Load (1.5ms) SELECT "firms".* FROM "firms" ORDER BY "firms"."id" ASC LIMIT 1
Invoice Load (3.1ms) SELECT "invoices".* FROM "invoices" WHERE "invoices"."firm_id" = $1 AND (number IS NOT NULL) ORDER BY number DESC LIMIT 1 [["firm_id", 1]]
NoMethodError: Invoice Load (0.7ms) SELECT "invoices".* FROM "invoices"
undefined method `number' for #<ActiveRecord::Relation::ActiveRecord_Relation_Invoice:0x00000008793198>
但是这个规范通过
describe Invoice do
let(:firm) {FactoryGirl.create(:firm)}
let(:invoice1) {FactoryGirl.create(:invoice, customer:customer, firm:firm , number: 2)}
let(:invoice2) {FactoryGirl.create(:invoice, customer:customer, firm:firm , number:3)}
it 'gets the last numberd invoice for spesific firm' do
invoice1
invoice2
Invoice.last_with_number(firm).number.should eq 3
end
end
我可以通过制作像这样的Invoice类方法来解决这个问题
def self.the_really_last(firm)
last_with_number(firm).last
end
并从
更改范围scope :last_with_number, -> (firm) {firm.invoices.where('number IS NOT NULL').order("number ASC").last}
到
scope :last_with_number, -> (firm) {firm.invoices.where('number IS NOT NULL').order("number ASC")}
这将适用于两个地方。
但是,为什么范围在规范和控制台中表现不同?
答案 0 :(得分:0)
我发现了它的作用。当所有记录都有number = nil时,就会发生这种情况。如果将last放在作用域的末尾,则返回一个包含所有记录的ActiveRecord :: Relation。我做了repo来说明
This rails issue gets a good explanation
为避免混淆,请勿在范围内使用last
first
或all