Question

我正在尝试使用INCLUDE过滤器将一堆javascript文件动态连接到一个文件中。 include.shtml.js测试脚本是

<!--#include virtual="/static/script2.js" -->
<!--#include virtual="/static/script1.js" -->

虚拟服务器配置为该文件设置SSIETag和SSILastModified {/ 1}}

On

它正确地提供了连接脚本，但始终是<VirtualHost *:80> ServerName test.dkt ServerAlias test.com UseCanonicalName Off ErrorLog logs/test.dkt-error_log CustomLog logs/test.dkt-access_log combined LogLevel info FileEtag All AddType application/javascript .js DocumentRoot /var/www/html/test.com <Directory /var/www/html/test.com> Options -Indexes ExpiresActive Off ExpiresDefault "access plus 1 years" Header append Cache-Control "public" Order deny,allow Allow from all </Directory> <Directory /var/www/html/test.com/static> <FilesMatch "\.shtml\.js$"> SSIETag On SSILastModified On Options +Includes SetOutputFilter INCLUDES </FilesMatch> </Directory> </VirtualHost>而不是200 OK。 304 Not Modified日志

Firebug

对Response Headers HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 16:57:12 GMT Server: Apache/2.2.15 (CentOS) Last-Modified: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 16:53:32 GMT Etag: "460bbc-5c-4f0ba32b7447d" Accept-Ranges: bytes Vary: Accept-Encoding Content-Encoding: gzip Cache-Control: public Content-Length: 40 Connection: close Content-Type: application/javascript Request Headers GET /static/include.shtml.js HTTP/1.1 Host: test.dkt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0 Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8 Accept-Language: pt-br,en-us;q=0.9,es;q=0.7,en;q=0.6,zh-tw;q=0.4,ar-sa;q=0.3,ar;q=0.1 Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate DNT: 1 Connection: keep-alive If-Modified-Since: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 16:53:32 GMT If-None-Match: "460bbc-5c-4f0ba32b7447d" Cache-Control: max-age=0过滤器的条件请求是否存在硬编码限制？

我知道只要任何包含的脚本发生更改，我就应该“触摸”包含脚本。 Apache版本是在Centos 6中运行的2.2

修改

使用@covener answer我使其工作设置文件的组执行权限并添加INCLUDE指令

Answer 1

即使您选择了etags，似乎您需要单独启用xbithack以允许生成304（核心中的ap_meets_conditions检查mod_include中引用的no_local_copy标志

http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_include.html#xbithack

/* When our xbithack value isn't set to full or our platform isn't
 * providing group-level protection bits or our group-level bits do not
 * have group-execite on, we will set the no_local_copy value to 1 so
 * that we will not send 304s.
 */
if ((conf->xbithack != XBITHACK_FULL)
    || !(f->r->finfo.valid & APR_FINFO_GPROT)
    || !(f->r->finfo.protection & APR_GEXECUTE)) {
    f->r->no_local_copy = 1;
}

Answer 2

当有

SSILastModified on 
XBitHack full

在配置文件中，设置“SSILastModified On”是一个无提示的错误配置，因为无论“SSILastModified”是否打开，它都不会改变任何程序行为。

回溯到Apache的源代码，我们可以看到这个错误配置的根本原因是“Xbithack Full”启用的语义隐式覆盖了“SSILastModified On”启用的语义。

if (conf->lastmodified > 0) {
  ... {
   ap_update_mtime(r, r->finfo.mtime);
   ap_set_last_modified(r);}}

else if (((conf->xbithack == XBITHACK_FULL ||
         (conf->xbithack == XBITHACK_UNSET &&
                DEFAULT_XBITHACK == XBITHACK_FULL))
        ...)) {
        ap_update_mtime(r, r->finfo.mtime);
        ap_set_last_modified(r);
}

所以一种可能的解决方案就是保留这个

Xbithack full

有条件请求未在包含中兑现

修改

2 个答案: