我正在尝试编写一个可以非POSIX方式接受命令行参数的Bash脚本。具体来说,我想使用getopts
以标准方式解析命令行参数,而还通过getopts
构建命令行参数列表 unexpected 它的选项字符串。我描述的方式的示例命令行参数解析显示在下面的代码注释中。我正在接近一个解决方案,但我的脚本只能识别唯一的意外参数,而我需要识别所有意外参数。我很感激解决这个问题的指导(可能通过聪明的AWK脚本)。非常感谢您的帮助。
#!/bin/bash
################################################################################
#
# This is a test of command line parameter parsing that is explicitly non-POSIX.
# This approach handles
# - options (for getopts)
# - arguments of options (for getopts)
# - positional arguments (for getopts) and
# - non-option arguments (command line parameters not expected by getopts).
# All non-option arguments are placed in the string non_option_parameters. The
# silent error reporting mode of getopts is required. Following command line
# parameter parsing, input information can be accepted based on internal
# priority assumptions.
#
# example usage:
# ./script.sh
# non-option parameters:
# ./script.sh -a Dirac
# -a triggered with parameter Dirac
# non-option parameters:
# ./script.sh -a Dirac -b
# -a triggered with parameter Dirac
# -b triggered
# non-option parameters:
# ./script.sh -a Dirac Feynman -b
# -a triggered with parameter Dirac
# -b triggered
# non-option parameters: Feynman
# ./script.sh -a Dirac Feynman Born -b
# -a triggered with parameter Dirac
# -b triggered
# non-option parameters: Feynman Born
# ./script.sh -a Dirac Feynman Born Born -b
# -a triggered with parameter Dirac
# -b triggered
# non-option parameters: Feynman Born
#
# WANT:
# ./script.sh -a Dirac Feynman Born Born -b
# -a triggered with parameter Dirac
# -b triggered
# non-option parameters: Feynman Born Born
#
################################################################################
option_string=":a:b"
non_option_parameters=""
process_arguments(){
OPTIND=1
while getopts "${option_string}" option; do
case ${option} in
a)
echo "-a triggered with parameter "${OPTARG}"" >&2 # output to STDERR
;;
b)
echo "-b triggered" >&2 # output to STDERR
;;
\?)
echo "invalid option: -"${OPTARG}"" >&2 # output to STDERR
;;
esac
done
shift $(expr ${OPTIND} - 1)
echo "$@"
}
parameters="${@}"
while [ ! -z "${parameters}" ]; do
parameters="$(process_arguments ${parameters})"
TEMP=$(echo "${parameters}" | awk -F " " '{print $1}')
IS_POS="$(echo "${option_string}" | sed 's/^:-://' | sed 's/\([a-zA-Z]\)/\ \1/g' | sed 's/\([a-zA-Z]\)/-\1/g' | sed 's/://g' | awk -v OPTION=${TEMP} \
'{
for(i=1; i<=NF; i++){
if( (match($i, OPTION)== 1) && (length($i) == length(OPTION)) ){
print $i
}
}
}' \
| wc -l)"
# The AWK code is quivalent to grep -w "-OPTIONCHAR". Note the trailing '-'
# character behind OPTIONCHAR). IS_POS tells whether the first element in a
# space-delimited string of parameters is a positional argument.
[ ${IS_POS} -eq 0 ] && non_option_parameters="${non_option_parameters} ${TEMP}"
T_ARRAY=""
for parameter in ${parameters}; do
[ $IS_POS -eq 0 ] && [ "${TEMP}" == "${parameter}" ] && continue
T_ARRAY="${T_ARRAY} ${parameter}"
done
parameters="${T_ARRAY}"
done
echo "non-option parameters:${non_option_parameters}"
答案 0 :(得分:2)
我不太明白IS_POS
变量应该做什么。它在我的机器(mac)上始终为0。第二个“Born”的问题在于T_ARRAY
的构建。当我将其更改为以下内容时:
T_ARRAY=$(echo "${parameters}" | awk -F " " 'NF > 1 { for( i=2; i<=NF; i++ ) printf("%s%s", $i, i == NF ? "" : " " ); next }')
然后我得到了所需的输出:
% script.sh -a Dirac Feynman Born Born -b
-a triggered with parameter Dirac
-b triggered
non-option parameters: Feynman Born Born
我认为问题出在
上[ $IS_POS -eq 0 ] && [ "${TEMP}" == "${parameter}" ] && continue
for parameter
循环的行匹配次数过多。替换awk只是从参数中删除了第一个元素 - 显然它没有关注IS_POS
。如果您的系统上IS_POS
非零,那么您可能需要更改它。
答案 1 :(得分:1)
您可以尝试按如下方式简化脚本:
non_option_par=""
par="${@}"
while [ ! -z "${par}" ]; do
par="$(process_arguments ${par})"
non_option_par="${non_option_par} "$(awk -F'[ \t]*-' '{print $1}' <<<"$par")
par=$(awk -F'[ \t]*-' 'NF>1{print substr($0,index($0,"-"))}' <<<"$par")
done
echo "non-option parameters:${non_option_par}"
(保持process_arguments
功能原样..)